Amber Heard has been accused of enhancing pictures of her bruises in a defamation lawsuit. Unsealed paperwork present that her group additionally accused Johnny Depp.

Amber Heard and Johnny Depp are suing each other for defamation. The trial became national news.Reuters/Reuters

  • Amber Heard’s team said forensic analysis cast doubt on the authenticity of photos of injuries provided by Johnny Depp.

  • Heard was also accused of editing photos of the alleged abuse during their defamation trial.

  • Almost 6000 pages of documents The Depp-Heard trial was unveiled this weekend.

According to newly revealed court documents, Amber Heard’s lawyers have accused Johnny Depp of editing photos of her scrapes and bruises, as well as Heard’s audio recording, which was presented during their defamation trial earlier this year.

Heard’s team, which includes lawyers Benjamin Rotterborn and Elaine Bredehoft, said metadata on the photos provided by Depp’s team contained dates that indicated the photos were altered years after they were taken. request for initiative from 2021 in December, which was unveiled over the weekend and previewed Daily Beast.

Among the alleged discrepancies was one photo with a creation date of 2019, even though the photo was allegedly taken in 2015, according to the proposal. Another photo did not have a creation date, but was changed to 2020. in July, Heard’s team reported.

The team also requested that Depp provide “all recordings with Ms. Heard’s voice.” request shows, but said that the audio files provided had been edited. Heard’s team requested full audio.

Forensic expert Julian Ackert, who was hired by Heard’s team to review Depp’s photo and audio files, questioned their authenticity, The Daily Beast reported.

“A missing creation date and/or modification date that is after the fact date can be a sign of tampering with digital evidence,” Heard’s team said of Ackert’s analysis.

The court decided to exclude Ackert’s testimony at trial, according to the proposal by Depp’s team.

Depp’s team argued that Ackert’s “altered” dates refer to when the image was last saved, and argued that Ackert’s findings would create “unfair prejudice” that would “mislead jurors.”

It was heard checking during the trial after two side-by-side photos of her bruises from 2016 were shown during the trial. in May, when one image is noticeably redder than the other.

Depp’s team claimed that Heard edited the photos to make her face “look more red”, which Heard denied. Heard that the photos differ due to lighting.

Depp’s attorney then brought witnesses who said they didn’t notice bruises on Heard’s face at the time.

Ackert testified during the trial that Heard’s photos were original. Depp’s forensic witness, Bryan Neumeister, testified that he could not checked whether the photos have been changed or not.

Depp’s attorney did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment.

Read the original article about Insider

Leave a Comment